Food Environment & Food Waste Assignment

Rubric

“Food Environment & Food Waste Assignment” Rubric
“Food Environment & Food Waste Assignment” Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Part 1

25.0 to >20.0 pts

High Performance
Substantive discussion of food environment(s). Discussion is detailed, supported with examples, and noted for creative connections to course materials to highlight salient points.

20.0 to >12.0 pts

Intermediate Performance
Superficial discussion of food environment(s). Discussion is adequate, though student uses few examples and makes limited connections to class sources.

12.0 to >0 pts

Low Performance
Student missing response to Part 1. OR Student response demonstrates minimal engagement with the topic(s) or understanding of the concept(s). Missing evidence of deep critical thinking or reflection.
25.0 pts

Part 2

25.0 to >20.0 pts

High Performance
Substantive discussion of food (in)security & hunger. Discussion is detailed, supported with examples, and noted for creative connections to course materials to highlight salient points.

20.0 to >12.0 pts

Intermediate Performance
Superficial discussion of food (in)security & hunger. Discussion is adequate, though student uses few examples and makes limited connections to class sources.

12.0 to >0 pts

Low Performance
Student missing response to Part 2. OR Student response demonstrates minimal engagement with the topic(s) or understanding of the concept(s). Missing evidence of deep critical thinking or reflection.
25.0 pts

Part 3

25.0 to >20.0 pts

High Performance
Substantive discussion of food waste. Discussion is detailed, supported with examples, and noted for creative connections to course materials to highlight salient points.

20.0 to >12.0 pts

Intermediate Performance
Superficial discussion of food waste. Discussion is adequate, though student uses few examples and makes limited connections to class sources.

12.0 to >0 pts

Low Performance
Student missing response to Part 3. OR Student response demonstrates minimal engagement with the topic(s) or understanding of the concept(s). Missing evidence of deep critical thinking or reflection.
25.0 pts

Grammar, Spelling, Punctuation

5.0 to >4.0 pts

High Performance
Minimal, if any errors, in grammar, spelling, and punctuation throughout reflection. Errors do not unduly inhibit communication of the student’s message.

4.0 to >0 pts

Intermediate Performance
Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation problems noted. These errors are overly distracting to the communication of the student’s message.
5.0 pts

APA Citations

10.0 to >8.0 pts

High Performance
Student provides proper APA citations for all sources used. Student also provides a complete ‘Reference’ list at the end of their submission.

8.0 to >0.0 pts

Intermediate Performance
Student may be missing some citations for sources used OR improper citations noted throughout post. ‘Reference’ list incomplete or noted with errors.

0.0 pts

Low Performance
Student has no citations or ‘Reference’ list.
10.0 pts

Sources

10.0 to >8.0 pts

High Performance
Student synthesized and cited many (at least five) of the course materials, making complex, clear and creative connections to justify and support discussion.

8.0 to >0.0 pts

Intermediate Performance
Student synthesized and cited less than five class sources. OR, Connections to class materials are not logical or relevant to current discussion.

0.0 pts

Low Performance
Student uses no class sources.
10.0 pts
Total Points: 100.0

"ORDER ASSIGNMENT NOW: ORIGINAL PAPER WRITTEN FROM SCRATCH AND WELL FORMATTED